儿童题材作品会成为新风口吗******
多个IP影视化
儿童题材作品会成为新风口吗
近日，以儿童为主角的幽默搞笑剧《米小圈上学记》在央视播出，夸张逗笑的校园生活、小演员们的精彩表演都比较有吸引力。除了动画作品，以儿童为目标群体的真人亲子影视剧一直不受市场重视，精品剧更是稀缺。《米小圈上学记》的热播，让不少观众感受到久违的低龄合家欢喜剧带来的快乐，也意味着这种风格的儿童创新喜剧有其市场。
记者 师文静
逗笑剧情和
小演员演技加分
《米小圈上学记》改编自同名儿童畅销读物，讲述了米小圈与同学姜小牙、铁头三人童真、荒诞又温情的校园故事，也有大量的家庭逗趣囧事。这部剧采用单元剧的形式，分别讲述“友情的真谛”“亲情温暖”“兴趣与梦想”“爱心养宠物”“家庭旅行”“团体运动”等主题故事，每个小故事都起承转合、充满温情。比如《班长之争》主题单元中，米小圈使出各种“手段”给同学留下好印象，在竞选班长中获得不少票数，但弄虚作假的拉票被老师识破，该单元探讨的是公平竞争的话题。再比如《二爷爷的心愿》单元中，二爷爷来米小圈家做客，米小圈使尽浑身滑稽招数，想让二爷爷给他买心爱的自行车，二爷爷为了满足米小圈的心愿，捡拾矿泉水瓶攒钱，而乐于助人的同学们则集体去帮助二爷爷，米小圈得知真相后感动地抱着二爷爷大哭，为了完成二爷爷的心愿，米小圈也卖掉自行车并全力以赴。故事很简单，主题很明显，教育小朋友要孝顺长辈、知恩图报、珍惜亲情。这部剧中一个个令人捧腹的小故事，都在传递积极向上的正能量。每集开头或结尾处，剧中的家长和老师都会对当集主题进行总结，引导孩子树立正确的价值观。
这部剧想通过一个个小故事传递正确价值观，不少故事的走向、人物举动其实都很大人思维，但这种单元小故事的紧凑形式能装下更多内容，也适合家长、孩子相伴观看。剧中也有不少笑点会引发思考，比如米小圈发愁没有朋友，没法写作文，爸爸本来要安慰儿子，但画风一转，因没有朋友而伤心哭泣的是爸爸。据悉，创作团队在打磨剧本的一年多时间内，对当下低年级小朋友和家长们正面临的、关心的社会议题进行了充分调研，由此头脑风暴出剧中笑点和各种主题表达。
《米小圈上学记》的创作、改编走的还是“情景+喜剧”的内容特色，兼具趣味性与教育性。值得一提的是，剧中郭赫轩、吴彦坤、黄洪铮、陈芷琰等小演员演得非常自然、松弛，贴合角色，很为电视剧加分。
儿童题材影视剧
注重开发大IP
《米小圈上学记》播出受到关注，是大IP效应的凸显。该剧原著已经在儿童文学圈火了很多年，虽然口碑不高，但知名度很高，对这种IP的开发更能吸引关注。
《小龙人》《快乐星球》《巴拉拉小魔仙》《家有儿女》等以儿童为主角的真人剧，满足了一代代儿童的观剧需求，而现在的影视创作、播出环境，除了动画片，很难再出优质儿童真人剧，但此类作品创作并没有停止，近两年开启了以开发大IP为主的创作风潮。比如融合真人表演与CG技术的《故宫里的大怪兽》系列，也是改编自近些年来非常火的儿童文学作品。《不是吧！我变成超人了》《超战真人》等剧集则改编自热门的动画IP。真人儿童电影《罐头小人》是根据作家郑渊洁的原著改编的。这两年国外儿童剧也一样重视对经典作品的改编，比如超高分美剧《小小安妮》，讲述一个11岁被领养女孩的成长，作品改编自著名的儿童文学作品《绿山墙的安妮》。以儿童为主角的奇幻冒险题材剧《鹿角男孩》也是改编自同名漫画，讲述一个头上长角的男孩为了弄清楚自己身世而展开的奇幻冒险旅程。
原创儿童题材影视剧很难创作、很难出精品的原因是，此类作品如果不能真正进入儿童视角、儿童内心，就会主题先行，展现训导之姿态，也容易走入浮夸、脱离实际的创作路径。这种改编大IP的潮流，更容易把作品做出圈或者做成优质内容。优质儿童文学IP非常多，不知道儿童影视剧改编会不会是下一个平台要积极占领的新内容风口。
齐鲁晚报
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩神彩票app地图 |
